-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Hi Mark
On Wednesday 3 March 2010 at 4:16:21 PM, you wrote: > On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 03:53:27PM +0000, MFPA wrote: >> There are privacy issues, especially if user-ids on the key contain >> email addresses. In some cases, the authorities knowing an individual >> used encryption could be a problem. > There are issues of tradecraft, then. Using OpenPGP as a tool for > committing crimes is kind of stupid. I was referring to the case where the individual was in a country that prohibited or restricted the use of strong encryption. >If one > chooses the wrong tool for a job, or chooses to use it incorrectly, no > blame attaches to others for the consequences of one's choice. Indeed. > I feel there is a strong assumption among OpenPGP users that our > community is, *ahem*, open. Is it not also a reasonable assumption, that those who use and promote privacy-enhancing software will value and respect privacy? - -- Best regards MFPA mailto:expires2...@ymail.com Ultimate consistency lies in being consistently inconsistent -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQCVAwUBS46uEqipC46tDG5pAQrv/wP/f+8WNNmA5Pq/GOzNotz2W7ysYMwQhY/P lkCmsoc7yWUa1cKaB4jE5YwzY0q+8jr3/oppnciCr+D8bL/SQS8WFTJNwPccPOIr Yddkfol6/yyQB4rrLWoDAamXpJQLvGkdPdwlynMNOIDEKthLZLDBZuY5LFktdnBy 3N4DEFKOvN4= =rHDV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users