-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Hi erythrocyte
On Friday 12 March 2010 at 12:46:28 PM, you wrote: > a typical browser such as Firefox will have almost 200 root > certificates from various CAs. 208 here, using Firefox 3.5.8 > Each of these adds a given amount of risk, that really should be > made transparent to end-users IMHO. I think you might mean the risk should be made *clear* to end-users? Security is already *transparent* to end users visiting a "secure" website whose root certificate the browser already trusts. > Some belong to well known CAs, while others belong to less reputable > ones. A lot there that I've not heard of. Could be perfectly reputable, but I am unaware of their reputation... - -- Best regards MFPA mailto:expires2...@ymail.com Think for yourself. Otherwise you have to believe what other people tell you. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQCVAwUBS5qYx6ipC46tDG5pAQpQsAP/TTwx9dfhUkdRCK3F6oGsiOUrmMP0SfZ8 zapd3RArehlkMChSUm2v4+DViQ8ZyOHc51S8sxuqPnnNb+ZXRaXx09vxkJSXmrR4 mQmnTQNIMDWLacUeI8hRNEVXriLpzgka0bX9q0QtsX1ZhqhLQmqLAT8CrsUn//Ek SX1KIDCHXF4= =kqyg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users