-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Hi
On Sunday 13 June 2010 at 10:03:00 AM, in <mid:201006131103.01...@thufir.ingo-kloecker.de>, Ingo Klöcker wrote: > IMNSHO, it's not up to the mailing list admins to > dictate where replies to my posts should go. Therefore, > the mailing list software should not touch the Reply-to > header. As far as I know, this is the only list I have ever subscribed to that does not set a reply-to header to the list address. I'm not saying it is "right" or "wrong," just unique in my experience. The admins don't "dictate" where replies go: the person replying does whatever they want. However, I would suggest that it *is* perfectly proper for the admins of any list to set headers that encourage posters (or their email software) to follow the etiquette of that group. In the case of GnuPG-users, that would perhaps be a reply-to header containing both the list address and the senders address. - -- Best regards MFPA mailto:expires2...@ymail.com Did you hear? They took the word gullible out of the dictionary -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQCVAwUBTBTeEaipC46tDG5pAQovlgP/ZM6sSGaX9gb+rm042SK23IRop39EmN/D JR7dhdPQ0yZRIIERldohuyaSz3wIwVXBs23AG156RABojALXAIAfcjAoc9oo1dII zcGhHNVIuXOYFJNt9cViuMnQ6ztk24rX0MiX7sOTBk6LF/pNsM3UPbCTSFqoGx3V Bq9QwGjaBnM= =AcRB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users