On Sun, 25 Jul 2010 11:09:34 -0400 MFPA <expires2...@ymail.com> wrote: >Hi > > >On Friday 23 July 2010 at 2:51:38 PM, in ><mid:20100723135138.5c873120...@smtp.hushmail.com>, >ved...@nym.hush.com wrote: > > >> [2] hiding the identity of the signer: > >> (a) generate a new keypair and give it to a person you >> want to have 'plausible deniability' with > >> (b) a signed >> message shown to anyone else, only means that 'one' of >> you signed it. > >If you received a message signed with 0x413b9aa558ffe07d, which >individual would you suppose had signed it? >(That key is on the servers.)
For this type of shared key, the key would be made with both individuals names: i.e. smithjo...@jonessmith.test (Comment: this keypair is in possession of both Smith and Jones) so, if you saw a signed message with this key, you would think it would be signed by either Smith or Jones vedaal _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
