On Fri, 15 Oct 2010 19:12:21 -0400, "Robert J. Hansen" <r...@sixdemonbag.org> wrote: > > Do you use ssh-agent? Do you think their implementation of the same > > thing is not good? If so, have you complained to them about it, or > > asked why the implemented it? > > This seems to be an argument from implication of hypocrisy: as if, > were I a user of ssh-agent, my opinion regarding gpg-agent could be > safely dismissed on the grounds of my hypocrisy by not bringing the > same issues up to the ssh-agent authors.
No, I was just curious why, if you were an ssh-agent user, you would be ok with the implementation there but not for gpg-agent. If you're not an ssh-agent user then you have nothing to get defensive about. jamie.
pgpP9szUlw4zT.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
