On 10/12/10 8:33 AM, John Clizbe wrote: > Ben McGinnes wrote: >> On 10/12/10 6:17 AM, Robert J. Hansen wrote: >>> On 12/9/10 1:30 PM, Ben McGinnes wrote: >> >>>> Is it possible that this current transition push is partially aimed >>>> at reigniting the WG's discussion by creating a new de-facto >>>> standard? >>> >>> Dunno, ask the WG. >> >> As soon as I find them ... >> > > mailto://[email protected] > > http://www.imc.org/ietf-openpgp/
Thanks. I think I'll lurk for a bit before I start causing trouble, though. ;) > I'll hit some of the other points in another post. Sure, take your time. Since Robert has pointed out that I'd overlooked (and had not been aware of) the enable-dsa2 option, I'm not rushing into a key migration at this point. I'm glad I asked, though, I've learned a lot in the last few hours. Regards, Ben
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
