On 12/12/2010 3:03 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > what do you mean by "V4 certificate checksums"?
Read the RFC. It's in there, and does a better job than I can do of explaining it. Section 5.5.3. > yeah, this is serious, but it's not embedded in the certificate. if we > were to come up with a new fingerprint format, it would not invalidate > any existing certificates -- it would just change how we refer to them. I am very skeptical of this claim you seem to be making, that we can just upgrade-in-place.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
