> More often "I have no confidence they keep their secret keys strictly under > their control" might be the relevant objection.
In my case, it's "I think these individuals are mentally unstable and violent," but yes. :) >> Speaking for Enigmail, it's because 99% of the time signatures are >> worthless. They contribute to the illusion of data integrity while >> actually providing no guarantees. > > You mix up the absence of a guarantee with being worthless. Show me the worth in a signed message that has any of (a) an incorrect signature, (b) from an invalid key, or (c) from someone you believe is utterly untrustworthy. _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
