On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 19:32, [email protected] said: > If I remember correctly, GPG only complains for invalid CRC. A missing CRC > is legal, as the CRC is a MAY.
I checked the code and there is a missing CRC message. I also recalled the the CRC is may. Looking again at it I noticed that I overlooked a one condition (the one which indicates that a CRC follows). Thus you are right, the CRC is optional. In any case the whole CRC and =====END PGP... is not relevant from a cryptographic point of view. Salam-Shalom, Werner -- Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz. _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
