On Thu, 03 Feb 2011 17:54:39 -0500, "Robert J. Hansen" <[email protected]> wrote: > > But i suspect he would not want to certify this User ID: > > > > Daniel Kahn Gillmor (I am really Robert Hansen) <[email protected]> > > Correct. Because the presence of my signature means something. The > *absence* means *nothing at all*, and you're smart enough to know that.
Just out of curiosity, can you explain why you wouldn't sign dkg's hypothetical user ID? jamie.
pgpkFAKu20oug.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
