On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 10:38:41 -0500 Daniel Kahn Gillmor <[email protected]> articulated:
> Fortunately, i don't think that the PRNG used in GnuPG has any known > vulnerabilities. The key word there is "known"; although the feasibility of rebuilding a private key by a normal end user is extremely slight. In any case, I am not going to be losing any sleep over it. Besides, if I wanted a truly secure encryption, I would use a one-time pad system. That is about as secure as it gets. -- Jerry ✌ [email protected] _____________________________________________________________________ Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. Ignorance is never out of style. It was in fashion yesterday, it is the rage today, and it will set the pace tomorrow. Franklin K. Dane
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
