-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Hi
On Thursday 3 March 2011 at 8:36:36 AM, in <mid:[email protected]>, Johan Wevers wrote: > Op 3-3-2011 1:21, MFPA schreef: >> Something that would not be necessary if the >> underlying openPGP implementations could handle hashed >> user IDs. > Isn't it much easier to use the key ID / signature for > that? You already have that. I don't understand. - -- Best regards MFPA mailto:[email protected] Success isn't how far you got, but the distance you travelled from where you started -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQE7BAEBCgClBQJNcrYBnhSAAAAAAEAAVXNpZ25pbmdfa2V5X0lEIHNpZ25pbmdf a2V5X0ZpbmdlcnByaW50IEAgIE1hc3Rlcl9rZXlfRmluZ2VycHJpbnQgQThBOTBC OEVBRDBDNkU2OSBCQTIzOUI0NjgxRjFFRjk1MThFNkJENDY0NDdFQ0EwMyBAIEJB MjM5QjQ2ODFGMUVGOTUxOEU2QkQ0NjQ0N0VDQTAzAAoJEKipC46tDG5pr3ED/RQb yNmn7SVKQojUvWRFZoKvI0Jt6AJC6MFovc3vNPMJKqsCfF+mYgGxsHL2t8oPaKkb O8asryh2EmUlFpJfHnqQD1bYQCgIdXWmTjSk5C5Sk7nwt6xZr7W2UW+ex8sHTsN3 +aidIIku/4dlwar8XB6GUMiOvQ9JGDJJCFQmniDK =rNlT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
