Something to think about that one. I guess I will experiment in the future, but I understand what you mean and you do have a point with the question > answer order rather than the reverse. Now I understand why Thunderbird has that option.
On 20/03/2011 05:35 PM, Grant Olson wrote: > On 03/20/2011 05:16 PM, Jonathan Ely wrote: >> Really? For me, it is much easier to access the newest reply instead of >> using the Down Arrow key to find it. Gmail always worked the same way >> for me. >> > > Ingo's talking about the body of the message. Most mailing lists people > reply after the question, so it's in context when you find a thread > later, instead of before, at the top of the message. > > Arguably, when reading a message out of context, it's easier when most > people see: > > QUESTION: What is the secret to life, the universe and everything? > ANSWER: 42 > > Rather than: > > ANSWER: 42 > QUESTION: What is the secret to life, the universe and everything? > > Which is what happens when you 'top-post' your answer at the top of the > message. > > If it's hard to do compose an interleaved reply with your screen-reader, > that's fine, but you will get people complaining about it every now and > then. If it's easy, you probably want do to reply after people's > comments, in context, instead of before, when you're on mailing lists. > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Gnupg-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
