Johan Wevers wrote:
> On 16-09-2011 21:30, Simone Cianfriglia wrote:
>
>> To achieve your desired result, it's required to run the exactly same
>> compiler, including the version, with the same options targeting the
>> correct architecture. Also a minor tweak in architecture settings
>> could change the result, see for example the --march and --mtune
>> directives of GCC to see how many choices there are.
>
> Which makes me wonder how hard it would be to build GnuPG 1.4.11 with MS
> Visual Studio. Back in the pgp 2 days I put a VS 5 (antique version)
> project file for pgp 2.6.3ia on my site to create a win2 binary - better
> than the distributed MS-DOS binary, at least it could handle long
> filenames. That was easy - just put all the .c files in the project.
>
> I'll just have to try.
>
You're much better off with MinGW and dependencies or Cygwin. There was a move
to try to write project files for Visual Studio some long time ago, but I don't
think anything became of it.
I have my own scripts, tuned bit by bit since 2004, but they are tailored to my
use.
--
John P. Clizbe Inet: John ( a ) Enigmail DAWT NET
FSF Assoc #995 / FSFE Fellow #1797 hkp://keyserver.gingerbear.net or
mailto:[email protected]?subject=HELP
Q:"Just how do the residents of Haiku, Hawai'i hold conversations?"
A:"An odd melody / island voices on the winds / surplus of vowels"
_______________________________________________
Gnupg-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
