Hi All, This is off topic, but HAPPY THANKSGIVING!!!!!
Paul On Nov 24, 2011, at 11:58 AM, Alex (via GPGTools) wrote: > (copy to gpgtools and gnupg for the last time) > > Hi Felix, > >> we are happy to join forces with anyone who's interested in bringing >> OpenPGP functionality into browsers and web mailers. > > this is very good news! Do you have a Github account? > >> In terms of project organization, hosting, name, etc. we are completely >> open. We can put up additional tools (bug tracker, wiki, etc.) or >> anyone of you can take over. > > Do you have a continuous build server? I started to configure an > infrastructure so we can move on. If anyone has objections or want to use > another setup, please feel free to communicate this. Here are the links: > > * Most important (everyone should be part of the mailing list) > * Web: openpgpjs.org > * Mail: [email protected] / list.openpgpjs.org > > * Second most important (with full access for seancolyer, Fitblip, me) > * Web (Tickets): tickets.openpgpjs.org > * Web (Sources): src.openpgpjs.org > * Web (Documentation): docs.openpgpjs.org > > * For someday > * Mail (core group): [email protected] > * Mail (core member): [email protected] > * Mail (Donations): [email protected] > * Web (Statistics): stat.openpgpjs.org > * Web (RSS): rss.openpgpjs.org > * Web (Twitter): twitter.com/openpgpjs > * Web (Youtube): youtube.com/openpgpjs > * Web (Google): plus.google.com/101278333271226805222 > > * Not yet started > * Web (Support): support.openpgpjs.org (e.g. tender) > * Web (Buildbot): build.openpgpjs.org (e.g. buildbot) > * Web (Blog): blog.openpgpjs.org (e.g. wordpress) > > Best regards, Alex > > On 24.11.2011, at 12:02, Felix 'FX' Lindner wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> we are happy to join forces with anyone who's interested in bringing >> OpenPGP functionality into browsers and web mailers. Right now, we are >> incorporating the fixes that follow the initial wave of issue/bug >> reports. Feel free to use the code anytime. >> >> In terms of project organization, hosting, name, etc. we are completely >> open. We can put up additional tools (bug tracker, wiki, etc.) or >> anyone of you can take over. >> >> Regarding key managment, I'm with Sean here. The user should be able to >> choose between server side storage, client side storage, no-secret-key >> (encrypt only), etc. That's why we clearly say that you should not use >> our prototype for confidential communication. >> >> cheers >> Felix >> >> On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 00:08:44 -0500 Sean Colyer <[email protected]> wrote: >>> I just came upon gpg4browser as well. Looking at the code it looks >>> like this is the most complete implementation out there currently. I >>> imagine that they have been working on this for some time and it's >>> quite impressive. Ironic that there was minimal development on this >>> for so long and now so much coincidental parallel development.. >>> >>> I've been working on key generation which is one area that I think >>> gpg4browser hasn't, and I'm sure there are a few others as they have >>> noted on their site. >>> >>> As for key management -- I like the concept of offering a range of >>> solutions, I think it's important we create a common interface for the >>> different methods that we can use to connect to a range of options. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Sean >>> >>> On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 9:22 PM, Crypto Stick < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi! >>>> I'm just wondering if unhosted.org could be an interesting and easy >>>> to implement storage backend for OpenPGP.js. It's advantage is that >>>> the keys could be stored at a different server resp. service >>>> provider than the web application is hosted. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Jan >>>> >>>> Am 22.11.2011 01:59, schrieb Alex (via GPGTools): >>>>> Hi there, >>>>> >>>>> just updated the attached overview picture, added two more >>>>> participants >>>> to this list (Jan (Crypto Stick) and David (DOMCrypt)) and also the >>>> GnuPG mailing list (might be of interest for someone there). Please >>>> have a look at the message thread below for details. >>>>> >>>>> If we can agree on the name OpenPGP.JS/openpgpjs (analog to >>>>> videojs, >>>> pdfjs, ...) we should move the documentation, tickets and sources >>>> from >>>>> >>>>> https://github.com/GPGTools/openpgpjs/wiki >>>>> https://github.com/GPGTools/openpgpjs/issues >>>>> >>>>> to >>>>> >>>>> https://github.com/openpgpjs/openpgpjs/wiki >>>>> https://github.com/openpgpjs/openpgpjs/issues >>>>> >>>>> Best regards, Alex >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 19.11.2011, at 23:04, Alex (via GPGTools) wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi there, >>>>>> >>>>>> also attached the scope of our project from my point of view. >>>>>> >>>>>> Best regards, Alex >>>>>> >>>>>> On 19.11.2011, at 11:55, Alex (via GPGTools) wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi there, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> just found GPG4Browsers[2], added the URL to our (temporary) >>>>>>> wiki[2] >>>> and the contact to our (again temporary) mailing list. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It seems to be clear that there is a big demand of a single core >>>> JavaScript OpenPGP implementation and we find more and more >>>> projects and developers. Still, the next issue seems to be to agree >>>> on a name before we can setup a infrastructure. Does anyone have a >>>> strong opinion on that (we can Doodle for a name)? I would like to >>>> continue with https://github.com/openpgpjs and add everyone >>>> interested in this project as admins. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Best regards, Alex >>>>>>> >>>>>>> [1] http://gpg4browsers.recurity.com/ >>>>>>> [2] https://github.com/GPGTools/openpgpjs/wiki >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 19.11.2011, at 07:27, Ryan Sears wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >>>>>>>> Hash: SHA256 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi Guys, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> So I realize that we're still in the very early stages of >>>>>>>> getting everything started, but I raised an issue here: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> https://github.com/GPGTools/openpgpjs/issues/9 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> about potentially moving to a different repo, as I feel like >>>>>>>> this is more under the GPGTools wing, and less of an >>>>>>>> independent project, with equal shares from all the developers >>>>>>>> (which is what I would like to >>>> see). >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I also wonder if we wish to stick with openpgpjs? Maybe we >>>>>>>> could come >>>> up >>>>>>>> with a cooler name? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> What are everyone else's thoughts on this? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Also like I said last night, I'm all finished with the >>>>>>>> signature >>>> stuffs, >>>>>>>> so now it's mostly just getting everything more polished then >>>>>>>> it >>>> already is: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> http://fitblip.github.com/JSPGP-Stuffs/pubkey.html >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Ryan >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 11/18/2011 11:30 AM, Alex (via GPGTools) wrote: >>>>>>>>> Thanks. Added it to the page: >>>> https://github.com/GPGTools/openpgpjs/wiki >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 18.11.2011, at 16:45, Lukas Pitschl | Dressy Vagabonds >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> the most complete OpenPGP implementation besides GPG I could >>>>>>>>>> find >>>> was an implementation in Perl. >>>>>>>>>> http://search.cpan.org/dist/Crypt-OpenPGP/ >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Maybe it's possible to learn a little from it and help by >>>>>>>>>> porting >>>> portions to Javascript. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Lukas >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Am 18.11.2011 um 12:06 schrieb Alex (via GPGTools): >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Hi there, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I think it would be good to outreach to the GPG mailing >>>>>>>>>>>> list. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I agree, this is issue 5 ( >>>> https://github.com/GPGTools/openpgpjs/issues/5 ). If someone from >>>> our small list here could sum up our current status and plan on the >>>> wiki ( https://github.com/GPGTools/openpgpjs/wiki ), I will post to >>>> other mailing lists/google/twitter/..., ask for others to >>>> participate and link to the according wiki page for more >>>> information. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Best regards, Alex >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On 18.11.2011, at 03:46, Sean Colyer wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I think it would be good to outreach to the GPG mailing >>>>>>>>>>>> list. >>>> Since Tino and Bill were added to this list, do either of you have >>>> any interest in working on this development? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I still have not heard back from mete0r, unfortunately. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I've continued to work on this from my end. I'm currently >>>>>>>>>>>> working >>>> on key generation, and seem to have most of the basics outlined... >>>> I'm having some trouble generating Key ID's that agree with the >>>> ID's generated by gpg. I believe I'm following 12.2 of RFC 4880 >>>> pretty closely, but I would love some insight if anyone has worked >>>> with this bit directly... >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 5:52 AM, Alex (via GPGTools) < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi there, >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> * How to proceed (e.g. which infrastructure to use)? >>>>>>>>>>>> ... >>>>>>>>>>>>> I can offer to extend our existing GPGTools >>>>>>>>>>>>> infrastructure to >>>> host everything related to this project. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> just to take the next step: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> * Sources: https://github.com/GPGTools/openpgpjs/ >>>>>>>>>>>> * Tickets: https://github.com/GPGTools/openpgpjs/issues >>>>>>>>>>>> * Documentation: https://github.com/GPGTools/openpgpjs/wiki >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards, Alex >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 08.11.2011, at 23:59, Alex (via GPGTools) wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi there, >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you for all your answers! I think there's a big >>>>>>>>>>>>> chance for >>>> us to develop a core OpenPGP JavaScript core library. Let me try to >>>> summarize: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Main Objectives (partly from >>>> https://github.com/GPGTools/Mobile/wiki/Introduction): >>>>>>>>>>>>> * (Test-driven) implementation of a standard JavaScript >>>>>>>>>>>>> OpenPGP >>>> implementation >>>>>>>>>>>>> * Make it clean and object orientated >>>>>>>>>>>>> * Merge existing code projects while starting from scratch >>>> creating a core library but without reinventing the wheel >>>>>>>>>>>>> * Use/integrate it in other projects >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Current Issues: >>>>>>>>>>>>> * How to proceed (e.g. which infrastructure to use)? >>>>>>>>>>>>> * How to contact Mete0r? >>>>>>>>>>>>> * Find even more developers (e.g. via gnupg mailing lists) >>>>>>>>>>>>> * Write initial tests (use cases, workflows, example >>>>>>>>>>>>> messages, >>>> expectations, ...) >>>>>>>>>>>>> * Which BigInt library to use? >>>>>>>>>>>>> * Support v3 keys? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Needed Infrastructure: >>>>>>>>>>>>> * Ticket system (e.g. lighthouse) >>>>>>>>>>>>> * Source versioning (e.g. github) >>>>>>>>>>>>> * Documentation (e.g. github wiki) >>>>>>>>>>>>> * Communication (e.g. mailing list) >>>>>>>>>>>>> * Continuos Testing (e.g. build bot) >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Codebase: >>>>>>>>>>>>> * Original HaneWIN >>>>>>>>>>>>> * gmail-Crypt >>>>>>>>>>>>> * mete0r >>>>>>>>>>>>> * JSPGP >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I can offer to extend our existing GPGTools >>>>>>>>>>>>> infrastructure to >>>> host everything related to this project. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards, Alex >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> http://gpgtools.org >>>>>>> http://gpgtools.org/about (Google+, Twitter, RSS) >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> <OpenPGP.js.pdf> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> http://gpgtools.org >>>>>> http://gpgtools.org/about (Google+, Twitter, RSS) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> http://gpgtools.org >>>>> http://gpgtools.org/about (Google+, Twitter, RSS) >>>>> >>>> >> >> >> -- >> Recurity Labs GmbH | Felix 'FX' Lindner >> http://www.recurity-labs.com | [email protected] >> Wrangelstrasse 4 | Fon: +49 30 69539993-0 >> 10997 Berlin | PGP: A740 DE51 9891 19DF 0D05 >> Germany | 13B3 1759 C388 C92D 6BBB >> HRB 105213 B, Amtsgericht Charlottenburg, GF Felix Lindner > > > -- > http://gpgtools.org > http://gpgtools.org/about (Google+, Twitter, RSS) > > _______________________________________________ > gpgtools-users mailing list > [email protected] > FAQ: http://www.gpgtools.org/faq.html > Changes: http://lists.gpgtools.org/mailman/listinfo/gpgtools-users > Unsubscribe: > http://lists.gpgtools.org/mailman/options/gpgtools-users/[email protected]?unsub=Unsubscribe&unsubconfirm=1 > > This email sent to: [email protected] _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
