-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Hi
On Saturday 17 December 2011 at 3:25:56 PM, in <mid:[email protected]>, Jerome Baum wrote: > I doubt the validity of those automated checks and > checks on the email anyway. What constitutes "owning" > [email protected]? As far as that server's checking is concerned, being able to receive the email they send out to that address and respond to it or click a link. - -- Best regards MFPA mailto:[email protected] Is it possible to be a closet claustrophobic? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQCVAwUBTuy9o6ipC46tDG5pAQr6OgQAuI5T26SVlJGQrQx5QtjqjCMPbcGKKnYR nbafgCX0CeYxHY6IVv0qw/67qt+dUdbdDdjHmJnn5LT0yqFSf7+sMG1PyBtbGTEk 8y/LeiNOfRkn26+4Fj/BdWoy4v07KW0iNj8ywYpp3EvHBi3vuInrOrVhDXwHD94w 8KFB84qIYvM= =GfRL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
