I'm assuming the the signatures indicate, roughly the set of options that my recipients will not receive an error about ignored preferences. For instance, symmetric algo 9 has been around for the last 10 years at least. but if I force it on someone who doesn't have it as a preference, the recipient will get a message about my ignoring preferences. For systems that are automated, this message may have repercussions, depending on how they were coded.
I'm identifying any recipients in my keyring that have preferences that conflict with my disabling of specific algorithms and functions. Thank you. John On Apr 6, 2012 12:15 PM, "Werner Koch" <w...@gnupg.org> wrote: > > On Fri, 6 Apr 2012 16:32, john.g...@computer.org said: > > > I am feeding the output of a list-packets for my keying into an awk script > > to build a report on the keys and the preferences for each key. > > You wrongly assume that signatures are valid. --list-packets does not > tell you this. > > > With-colons doesn't provide enough detail for this report. I vaguely > > That's right. For what to you need this information? > > > Shalom-Salam, > > Werner > > -- > Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz. >
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
