As a curiosity, any ideas on what you would do to avoid use of this system for spam purposes? (although encrypted spam won't be of much use :)
Steve <[email protected]> wrote: >> I don't know how much the demand is (or could be) but perhaps it >would help >> make more people use OpenPGP to have a round-robin email contact >system. >> Whoever is willing to help new users (like in this case) registers >his email >> address with the languages he's capable of communicating in. A new >user could >> send a mail to >> >> [email protected] >> [email protected] >> ... >> >> and the mail would be forwarded to one or two people. OpenPGP-Addons >for email >> software (like Enigmail) could hint the user at this service. > >Hi all, > >I absolutely agree. At GPGTools we thought about an automatic testing >system. Checking if the mail was encrypted and / or signed and then >sending out the according reply. > >As with so many things and I assume Werner and the Enigmail people know >the problem, we never managed to get it done. I'm not sure if one >system to rule them all is ideal. Since if a user of GPGTools sendss an >unencrypted but signed mail we'd direct him at the according knowledge >base article. If we'd use one mail address for GPTools / Enigmail / >terminal users, it might be hard to provide the correct information to >help users. So it might not be automatable thus create more work. > >Currently we encourage the user to send a test mail and do all this >manually. > >All the best, >steve_______________________________________________ >Gnupg-users mailing list >[email protected] >http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users -- Branko Majic Jabber: [email protected] Please use only Free formats when sending attachments to me. Бранко Мајић Џабер: [email protected] Молим вас да додатке шаљете искључиво у слободним форматима. _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
