-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 On 5/06/12 2:47 AM, Werner Koch wrote: > On Mon, 4 Jun 2012 10:49, [email protected] said: > >> Was there any explanation of why the marketing people dropped or >> wanted to drop the functionality? > > Maybe outdated technical specs which made it to the marketing > dept. I don't know - you need to ask Symantec.
Fair enough. Most people I correspond with use GPG, I'll worry about it if I ever have trouble with someone encrypting to my El-Gamal key. Regards, Ben -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iEYEAREKAAYFAk/M7DgACgkQNxrFv6BK4xMSzQCfU/9j5BT30vntyY+gu4MTnT6a P7AAn1C26VYQVxeeYnDrKLVYNF4N2Kxg =ZucR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
