On Tue, 31 Jul 2012 12:54, [email protected] said: >> Not a good idea, because GnuPG 2.1 requires the gpg-agent and won't see >> any private key stuff. > > Not necessarily if you use the `--batch`, `--no-use-agent`, or > `--no-tty` (or a mix of the I'm not sure right now, but the manual
Nope. Recall that I implemented the stuff. > But on the other side, not always you have the option of running a > `gpg-agent` (for example on server side of a background job, etc.), I run it on servers ;-). Shalom-Salam, Werner -- Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz. _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
