On Wed, 5 Dec 2012 22:39, [email protected] said:
> If I wanted to have a fallback for loosing the mapping table, would
> there be a sane way to encrypt the filename with gpg? That way I could
--set-filename string
Use string as the filename which is stored inside
messages. This overrides the default, which is to use the
actual filename of the file being encrypted.
If you want later want gpg to output to this file, you may use
--use-embedded-filename
--no-use-embedded-filename
Try to create a file with a name as embedded in the
data. This can be a dangerous option as it allows to
overwrite files. Defaults to no.
Salam-Shalom,
Werner
--
Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz.
_______________________________________________
Gnupg-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
