Somebody claiming to be David Shaw wrote:
On Jan 4, 2013, at 9:39 AM, Stephen Paul Weber <[email protected]> wrote:Somebody claiming to be David Shaw wrote:I was hoping that with all the "advanced mode, you probably don't care about this" features, there would be one for this.On Jan 3, 2013, at 9:53 PM, Stephen Paul Weber <[email protected]> wrote:tell gpg or gpg2 to produce "new" packet length headers for output?No.You could patch the code (look in build-packet.c) fairly easily if you need this. Out of curiosity, why do you want to use only new packet headers?
I might do that if I get further along. I want to be able to have partial OpenPGP implementations that only bother with new-style headers. Such implementations' ouput can be read by gpg, but there's currently no way to convince gpg to talk to them :)
My own implementations currently do support both kinds of headers, so it's not a pressing need.
-- Stephen Paul Weber, @singpolyma See <http://singpolyma.net> for how I prefer to be contacted edition right joseph
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
