On 23/05/13 20:25, NdK wrote: > Really useful, IMVHO. Unless you have to sign *a lot* of things...
Werner Koch does not agree it's a security feature (and I suppose that's why you think it's useful), as he said in this[1] thread: > In any case it is not a security measure because the host may simply > cache the PIN and and silently do a verify command before each sign > operation. To avoid that simple workaround, a pinpad reader which > filters the VERIFY command would be needed. Peter. [1] http://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-users/2013-February/046051.html -- I use the GNU Privacy Guard (GnuPG) in combination with Enigmail. You can send me encrypted mail if you want some privacy. My key is available at <http://digitalbrains.com/2012/openpgp-key-peter> _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
