Hmm, since everyone seems to think "He doesn't consider the unviersity computer secure enough for something, so he shouldn't consider it secure enough for anything", it seems I'm failing and communicating what I want to do. Maybe having a look at the following scenario will help:
I have three computers, a smartphone named CONFIDENTIAL, a desktop in my office named SECRET, and one in the underground shelter with armed guards and the dog that needs to be fed the right type of meat to let me through named TOPSECRET. I have email addresses confidential@me, secret@me and topsecret@me. People sending confidential mail will send to confidential@me, and expect a reply within a short timeframe, so I need to be able to decrpyt and read the mail on CONFIDENTIAL. On SECRET, I want to read mail sent to confidential@me and secret@me. People that value security over timely processing will send mail to topsecret@me. On TOPSECRET I want to be able to decrypt mail sent to confidential@me, secret@me and opsecret@me. Nothing that happens to computer CONFIDENTAIL may allow other people to read mail sent to secret@me or topsecret@me. Nothing that happens to SECRET may allow other people to read mail sent totopsecret@me. I can handle this scenario by having three keypairs, one for each of the email addresses. But this would require everyone to sign all three of these keys. Is there a way to handle this secnario, such that people only have to sign one key? Philipp _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
