-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Hi
On Monday 16 September 2013 at 10:33:59 PM, in <mid:[email protected]>, Doug Barton wrote: > Like I said, reasonable minds can differ. I personally > don't find it all that burdensome to select the uids > that I am willing to sign when I get the responses > back. It doesn't sound that onerous to me. But I have to wonder what is actually gained by selectively signing the uids? Doesn't GnuPG calculate key validity based on all the certifications on a key, rather than taking into account only the signatures on an individual uid? So keeping track of selectively-signed uids on other people's keys on an ongoing basis might be very burdensome indeed. - -- Best regards MFPA mailto:[email protected] War is a matter of vital importance to the State. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQCVAwUBUjo6JKipC46tDG5pAQr5NgP8C1OyVHVA652PwF00KeD4qu3pmrDNlTd7 Yw3k6cQ3ho+OTnID5IMAitljbgOpvz7uvOpjqZgsUVQBW2rI639X8HZa5iwvcx1U Z0/lQthZmo6B+UWd3QQqM1OuXsSpK15dcKx33sNo5VIkCDZYQOC8h4hR7vZMuYkB DAkcJh9Vvgs= =v8WP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
