Werner Koch: > On Tue, 24 Sep 2013 17:40, [email protected] said: > > > According to RFC3156 [2] which defined `application/pgp-signature`, > > I believe this to be wrong. Can any one confirm this? > > No. RFC-3156 (PGP/MIME) does not really care about this mime type > because: > > OpenPGP signed messages are denoted by the "multipart/signed" content > type, described in [2], with a "protocol" parameter which MUST have a > value of "application/pgp-signature" (MUST be quoted). > > ... the mulitpart/signed container has two parts: An arbittrary MIME > part and a MIME part with a content-type as described by the "protocol" > paramter (e.g. application/pgp-signature). Any other use is not defined > by PGP/MIME.
Thanks for your prompt reply. I just filled <https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69794>. -- Lunar .''`. [email protected] : :Ⓐ : # apt-get install anarchism `. `'` `-
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
