Am Montag, 16. Dezember 2013 20:42:54 schrieb Werner Koch: > May I suggest to read the archives of just a few weeks to collect the > reasons why suggestions of using SHA-512 are missing the point. Some > folks here must have bleeding fingertips from repeating the arguments > over and over.
What about placing this as an FAQ in the wiki.gnupg.org? I believe we can then refine the argument, so it can be understood more easily.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
