On Jan 12, 2014 3:52 AM, "MFPA" <[email protected]> wrote: > Sam Kuper wrote: > > Yes, as I said, it could tamper with the message. But > > if it does that, then when a recipient attempts to > > verify the signature, gpg --verify will give the > > message, "gpg: BAD signature". > > Not if the malware tampered with the message *before* the signature > was applied.
Good point :) Sam
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
