-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Hi Per,
On 02/12/2014 09:31 AM, Per Tunedal wrote: > Hi Peter, Yes, I've searched the archives. Conclusion: There's not > any immediate danger to GnuPG. > > But, all the same: I cannot find any information on what's the > plans for the future. Sooner or later a transition to some other > hash has to take place, hasn't it? The appropriate place for such a change would be new defaults in the standards, i.e. that this likely would be part of a future V5 OpenPGP key format. The appropriate ML for that would be [0] References: [0] http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/openpgp/current/maillist.html - -- - ---------------------------- Kristian Fiskerstrand Blog: http://blog.sumptuouscapital.com Twitter: @krifisk - ---------------------------- Public PGP key 0xE3EDFAE3 at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3 - ---------------------------- Aut disce aut discede Either learn or leave -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJS+zNOAAoJEPw7F94F4TagzXAP/Riqy9hbjuncUmGbDU+hOgMw nnjSFw41uP+UqVKypo5RTCfkv59euPRq8d0MYPtUEeSLvbMkX40Hhl/i0AilM4MD zq+LuytJ+SiQMdzlU+helyMWU5hLObOLkl4JmPzAmAaXM6MXDedn4UNpcpFxGhPt Zh4uQ2VFjzXQCH5gTKyRL6liq/+TPb/m5wpNjYqqiKxDkmeFnh9MtPTE7Qo/raYi eCbPN8zcL8e+Z4FofNGTY62hTFve0SrC6JVWq1S/EG4Usgf8Mp7Ab/ppuCHlnVee 78McbqdOgSkp5IINe0il2k+tpO6q+uauX/hPkv49cZc2d+FqAhRWCMCaNZ//v8uk jYDnFSoW0p3I9BFr4CjlmfN7E/PfKGjFHooU8isyHlBBSlgFTuJ96UU0283I5+iv AKVDwNxBAGqljvGbdPzObhGU5P7s7whZFzUzDiVkFLdRTT4c6BwFUmqkxNtUTV+F zmWH+HCR/FLpmvq8SXsBKuJbvxm8JbxLXEABJJEPTObK82ClE9DiK5mWIrBF/1H2 xk/TZo8+bZtWALzAkCDWV+VejazMgV2x9u+pFnNzXB4dRuCRW94tlcbbbRwMC6YV y1aH1ma4I7ggcOzmyV46XzNuRaclgbxpvCrUiFj0fzxF9R1mafEL5bWtfbi8Xl1e I/6BWRgyN+kqqiihWJSu =FBe2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
