> More likely 128 was a typo for the more common older RSA key of 1028 > ...
Either-or. RSA-1024's dangerously close to being brute-forceable, too. We've already brute-forced RSA-768 and we're closing in on RSA-890. I haven't looked into how well the general number field sieve parallelizes, but I wouldn't want to take bets on how long RSA-1024 could stand up to a massive Amazon Cloud instance. _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
