Am Sa 08.11.2014, 20:49:24 schrieb Robert J. Hansen: > What you're looking at is called an em dash (or an en; the FAQ uses > both) and is typographically correct.
It is correct if an em dash is meant. It does make absolutely no sense to use a "–" when code is involved where only "--" works. This is about –— BEGIN instead of -----BEGIN and –recipient instead of --recipient > Unicode offers proper > hyphens, en dashes and em dashes, though, so the FAQ uses them. No, it doesn't. In 47 of 49 cases it uses "--". I did not want to suggest to replace the dash in "Margolus–Levitin". Hauke -- Crypto für alle: http://www.openpgp-schulungen.de/fuer/unterstuetzer/ http://userbase.kde.org/Concepts/OpenPGP_Help_Spread OpenPGP: 7D82 FB9F D25A 2CE4 5241 6C37 BF4B 8EEF 1A57 1DF5 _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
