On 17/11/14 23:06, Paul R. Ramer wrote: > On November 15, 2014 10:02:44 AM PST, Samir Nassar <[email protected]> > wrote: >> For those of you who come to David's post in the future through the >> mailing >> list archive: Disregard this misconception. Many of us, myself >> included, use >> gpg2 on a 64bit system without a problem. > > Personally, I have used gpg2 and gpg on 64-bit and 32-bit versions of Linux, > Macintosh, and Windows. It has always been transparent. No issues to write > home about. > > Cheers, > > -Paul > > > > -- > PGP: 3DB6D884 > > _______________________________________________ > Gnupg-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users > Paul,
Just because you have no problems - and then to take on the role of an authority is misguided - and i must say completely stupid of you. Everything's all right with my world and so everything's right in the world - all other people's wrongs are fictions. Your remarks are entirely your own - and have no basis in the real world. The more you write the more fictions you will produce. (1) I accept without any questions that people run Linux and Windoz 64 bit and have no problems - I accept this as a reality. (2) Another reality which I accept is that running a Linux 64 bit O/S you can not sign or encrypt files. (3) Another reality I have to accept is none or very very very few of you have the technical know-how to come up with a solution. (4) I'd not ask most of you to change a light-bulb. But I still like you :) David -- “See the sanity of the man! No gods, no angels, no demons, no body. Nothing of the kind.Stern, sane,every brain-cell perfect and complete even at the moment of death. No delusion.” https://linuxcounter.net/user/512854.html - http://gbenet.com
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
