On Sat, 6 Dec 2014 16:25, [email protected] said: > I noticed when verifying signatures in the last few days that the > %g in my recent signatures is expanding to a string of zeros instead > of the fingerprint of the signing key.
Right, there was a regression. Works again; here a test using a subkey gpg: Good signature from "foo bar <[email protected]>" [ultimate] gpg: Signature notation: [email protected]=0000000000000000000000000000000000000000 gpg: Signature notation: [email protected]=C91D0631309FE8FD3277446BCD6A67456C563330 gpg: Signature notation: [email protected]=3BCC875789C4D11CBC1A8D2794115DF018AEC210 signed-byf (%f) is all-zero because this is not key signature. Shalom-Salam, Werner -- Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz. _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
