Il 13/01/2015 16:34, David Shaw ha scritto: > I like the idea of adding a proper fingerprint to signature packets. I seem > to recall this was suggested once in the past, but I don't recall why it > wasn't pursued. What I don't understand (surely because of my ignorance of GPG inner working) is what that should add to the security... IOW, if the private key have been generated by a third party to have a certain fingerprint, what's the purpose of adding that fingerprint to the signature?
BYtE, Diego. _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
