I revoked my gpg key yesterday because it was superceded by a newer one. Now recepients of my messages during the last few years are getting a warning that the key is invalid - even though it was perfectly valid the date the messages were signed:
gpg: Signature made 2015-02-05T19:28:21 ART using RSA key ID 1BFBED44 gpg: Good signature from "Hugo Osvaldo Barrera <[email protected]>" [unknown] gpg: WARNING: This key has been revoked by its owner! gpg: This could mean that the signature is forged. gpg: reason for revocation: Key is superseded gpg: revocation comment: Superseded by 0x28C61189. gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature! gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner. Primary key fingerprint: AA73 5C33 E081 E0D2 C945 5B12 873C F207 1BFB ED44 Did I do something wrong? Isn't the revokation date compared to the signature date? Does this mean that if someone revokes their key today, *all past* signatures become invalid? -- Hugo Osvaldo Barrera A: Because we read from top to bottom, left to right. Q: Why should I start my reply below the quoted text?
pgpQaCDyP2VRj.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
