On Fri 2015-02-27 03:07:39 -0500, MFPA wrote:
> On Tuesday 24 February 2015 at 10:16:20 PM, in
> <mid:[email protected]>, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>
>> That is, only a malicious person who manages to
>> compromise that key material can make signatures with
>> it. So why are you keeping it around?
>
> To verify existing signatures?
Signatures are verified with the public part of the key. I was only
suggesting to destroy the secret part of the key.
--dkg
_______________________________________________
Gnupg-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
