> So what are data uri classified as then? Something that's mostly limited to web browsers and a couple of email clients. It's meant for including data in-line in web pages, not as separate documents, and has pretty close to nil adoption in the rest of the ecosystem.
Adopting a special OpenPGP data URI scheme just for web browsers seems pretty weird to me. Especially given how difficult it would be to get the browser community to adopt it -- as a general rule, no standard can take off unless Internet Explorer supports it. (XHTML 1.0 and 1.1, may you rest in peace.) If you can get Microsoft to support this, or someone to produce an IE plugin to handle it, then maybe. But otherwise, I think a web-specific data URI for OpenPGP data is DOA. _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
