2015-07-02 18:59 GMT+02:00 Daniel Roesler <[email protected]>: > Will the proposal require support private subkey stubs generated from > gpg --export-secret-subkeys?
That's a good question and the spec is indeed not specific enough here. If I'm not mistaken Mailvelope only includes the primary key packets in their current implementation. But it makes sense to include subkey packets as well. Something to be clarified in the spec. Tankred > On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 6:48 AM, Tankred Hase <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I'm Tankred from Whiteout (https://whiteout.io). Me, Werner and other >> PGP projects discussed a secure way to synchronize a user's private >> key between devices during the OpenPGP summit in April >> (https://www.gnupg.org/blog/20150426-openpgp-summit.html). The goal >> was to formalize and hopefully standardize a very simple protocol that >> allows interoperability between mail user agents. >> >> We've already gotten feedback from other vendors using OpenPGP.js such >> as Mailvelope and 1&1, and we would also like to hear what the GPG >> community has to say about it. Here is our current proposal: >> >> https://github.com/whiteout-io/mail-html5/wiki/Secure-OpenPGP-Key-Pair-Synchronization-via-IMAP >> >> Thanks for any feedback! >> >> Kind regards, >> Tankred >> >> -- >> Whiteout Networks GmbH c/o Werk1 >> Grafinger Str. 6 >> D-81671 München >> Geschäftsführer: Oliver Gajek >> RG München HRB 204479 >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Gnupg-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users -- Whiteout Networks GmbH c/o Werk1 Grafinger Str. 6 D-81671 München Geschäftsführer: Oliver Gajek RG München HRB 204479 _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
