On 18.07.15 17:21, Philip Neukom wrote: > I put "secure" in quotes as they talk about a "proprietary" encryption > algorithm. As soon as I read "proprietary", I have to roll my eyes as I > don't necessarily trust encryption if it isn't open for everyone to verify.
Pretty much. > Is this similar to what has been discussed as a potential use or service > by GnuPG? The service isn't seamless but perhaps would make sense as an > offering by GnuPG/Werner? No. There is a standard called OpenPGP already and this service is not relevant in any way. See the how it works page[1]. They can't and don't change how email, i.e. SMTP works. They just send the receiver a link to their web service and both their client and recipient use a browser to do their "emailing". The world is full of services like that. GnuPG and other OpenPGP compliant software sign and / or encrypt the /contents of email/. [1]: http://e-courier.ca/howitworks.html -- Ville
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
