On Thu, 17 Sep 2015 17:32, [email protected] said: > to be clear, i think you want A lookups, AAAA lookups, and SRV lookups, > right? Or do we want even more than that, for example CERT records,
Right. And yes, I expect CERT or OPENPGPKEY records to becode important soon. PTR lookups are probably also required. > Would it be possible to start with a --use-tor flag that implied no use > of SRV or OPENPGPKEY or anything else? then people could set that in That would be an option. The full resolver functionality is required for the pools. But for a single server we can change the code to skip all the pool stuff. > This seems to be the current state of things: Thanks for the pointers. > Another option would be use a DNS server that supports TCP, of > course. (e.g. google's 8.8.8.8 offers TCP connections) That could be In fact, all DNS servers need to support TCP for longer results. However I do not want to write my own resolver (or well, for Windows we are already use my forked ADNS). I need to look at the state of things first. Salam-Shalom, Werner -- Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz. _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
