[Sent from my iPad, as it is not a secured device there are no cryptographic keys on this device, meaning this message is sent without an OpenPGP signature. In general you should *not* rely on any information sent over such an unsecure channel, if you find any information controversial or un-expected send a response and request a signed confirmation]
> On 06 Nov 2015, at 22:37, MFPA <2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net> > wrote: > > I'll partially go along with that. It was reasonable for the sender to > encrypt to those keys because the sender "trusts" them; fair enough. > But that doesn't address my question of "Is it reasonable for the > recipient to want to check whether or not *they* "trust" the other > keys to which the sender encrypted the message?" or my assertion that > GnuPG does not perform this check. > > > I'm not really sure if I understand what this would protect against; The sender can send the information in multiple emails, even forward it unencrypted without you having any control of it. _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
