On 01/12/15 12:09, Werner Koch wrote: > On Tue, 1 Dec 2015 09:41, [email protected] said: > >> point is identical no matter which encoding is being used. The only >> time you would see the raw utf-8 bytes would be if the software was >> Unicode-incapable or if the locale was set incorrectly, leading it to >> be interpreted as a sequence of bytes. > > Would it be worth to detect this corner case and ignore the BOM?
I think so. The use of BOM as a UTF-8 marker is not going to go away any time soon... Andrew.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
