On Tue, 22 Dec 2015 14:45:59 +0100, Matthias Apitz wrote: > El día Tuesday, December 22, 2015 a las 02:41:24PM +0100, Neal H. Walfield > escribió: > > > Hi Matthias, > > > > On Tue, 22 Dec 2015 13:28:28 +0100, > > Matthias Apitz wrote: > > > Question: Why I do not have a file .gnupg/secring.kbx (as I have had > > > with v1.x)? And, why are the keys stored in .gnupg/private-keys-v1.d? > > > > The short answer is that we are using a new format. > > > > Note: GnuPG 2 will automatically migrate keys from secring.kbx to > > .gnupg/private-keys-v1.d the first time it is run. > > Hi Neal, > > Just to make sure: there have been no v1.x keys (I move away the old > .gnupg dir), why are the new v2 keys in a dir named .gnupg/private-keys-v1.d?
I don't really understand your question, but I'll try to answer what I think you are asking: secring is the old format; private-keys-v1.d is the new format. GnuPG 1 doesn't know about the new format; GnuPG 2 only uses the new format, but the first time it is run it will migrate any existing keys from the old format to the new format. :) Neal _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
