On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 03:45:09PM +0100, Bernhard Reiter wrote: > On Tuesday 22 March 2016 at 15:14:41, Ben McGinnes wrote: > > You know what might, though, if someone were to take up the old GPA > > project perhaps ... maybe port it to GTK 3 or implement a Qt version. > > We have just cleanup and simplified the structure of Kleopatra, > so that is making steps into the direction of the Qt5 version > you are thinking of. If you want to help improve a gui part > Andre currently is hacking on Kleopatra, so that is a good chance > to test and give feedback about its user interface. > > We want to know what it would take to make Kleo an easy > to use crypto GUI for GnuPG.
Ah, no, I think I'll have to leave that to the others. Mainly because I already have quite the task ahead of me with the future planned GPGME Python 3 work (GPyGME, but it's waiting on the GPGME overhaul), though also because the last serious effort I made at any GUI programming was with Tkinter about 15 years ago (and I sucked at it). As for more modern things ... well I'verecently dumped Thunderbird to return to Mutt plus Emacs, so I guess that says something. Note, that wasn't Enigmail's fault, it was purely the compounding of Mozilla's ... whatever it's becoming (plus it can't handle the volume of mail and accounts I have to deal with). Regards, Ben
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
