On Wed, 27 Apr 2016 11:31, [email protected] said: > Yes, I think it would be better if stuff like GPGME, libassuan, > libgcrypt, libgpg-error, libksba and pinentry got their own category on > the website rather than being a peer to the other stuff in related > software...
I changed this library page a bit to better address your issues. > While "related software" is a large list, I don't think it's meant to be > exhaustive. I'm also not sure what the qualifications are to be > considered for being added (other than being free software). I think > this is done informally, on an ad-hoc basis. Right, just write or even better add a bug report (gpgweb/whish). Salam-Shalom, Werner -- Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz. _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
