>> 1. Are you a privacy absolutist? > > Yes. Thank you for being clear on that.
>> 2. If yes, why should we listen to you? > > The child porn excuse is used too often... But this doesn't answer my question. Why should we listen to a privacy absolutist? > You can try - someone might have used a weak password, wrote it down > somewhere or made another mistake. Or can be pressured into telling it > (the famous $5 wrench comes to mind here). Wait, wait, wait. You're opposed to *any* kind of privacy circumvention... but you're okay with torture? You're seriously advocating "swing a wrench at this guy's knees and make him talk" as an alternative to any kind of circumvention of a privacy technology? Johan, your position is morally incoherent. _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
