Le 2016-12-12 à 03:45, Peter Lebbing a écrit : > I really like this suggestion! I had to think about it for a while > before I could see a way to make it work. The trouble is that I want > caff to be able to process the file, and for that I need to keep it > having much of the same patterns. I ended up not significantly altering > the two files compared to what I proposed, but instead suggesting > everybody should use the scrubbed version. That way, the instructions > are the same for all participants.
Also, while I promised to forever hold my peace, you might want to give
people a a programmatic way to make the scrubbed list so that those who
print their own don't need to manually verify it. This might add too
much complexity, so I don't know whether it is worthwhile.
Something like
sed -re '/^(pub|\s+Key fingerprint).*$/d' <main.txt >scrubbed.txt
is easy enough to verify by eye as not being a trick. The //d (rather
than s///) is important because unless it makes the list shorter, there
isn't any incentive to go to the trouble :)
Thanks,
Lachlan
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
