On Fri, 22 Sep 2017 21:44:06 +0200, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: > On 09/22/2017 09:40 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: > > So all is as it is supposed to be > > Just to add, the alternative if not considering WoT is a direct > validation structure, a user in this case should only (locally) sign > keyblock information of communication peers after a direct fingerprint > exchange in person, that removes any need for adding ownertrust to > keys not your own and simplifies the model.
Good points, thanks! Regards Stefan -- https://www.behance.net/futagoza https://keybase.io/stefan_claas _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
