On Sat, 4 Nov 2017 06:06, robb...@gentoo.org said: > Yes, the older versions do perform much worse, but even with gnupg2.2, > each exec of gpg is still at least 100ms, which adds up over time.
I doubt that, let's see: $ time sh -c 'seq 1 1 | xargs -n 1 gpg --version >/dev/null' real 0m0.010s user 0m0.004s sys 0m0.004s $ time sh -c 'seq 1 100 | xargs -n 1 gpg --version >/dev/null' real 0m0.361s user 0m0.068s sys 0m0.024s This is less than 4ms per exec. So you problem is for sure not the fork/exec. Salam-Shalom, Werner -- Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz.
pgpgiYrylJG41.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
