> (Oh, by the way, usually when I talk about DRM, I'm talking about giving > somebody data but restricting the ways in which they can use that data. > It's not clear to me how DRM applies when you want to simply not give > data at all, to anybody. But this is not really pertinent to the > discussion, so never mind.)
I was the one who brought up DRM. What Stefan and Listo want is some mechanism by which, if I have a copy of their public key, I can be prohibited from sharing that with a keyserver. How I get to use data in my possession is controlled by a third party -- that's DRM. In this case it's a voluntary, half-assed DRM scheme, but it's still in the family of DRM schemes.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
